ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x runs 8h longer. The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 detects 1522m further and is 320g lighter. Value pick: Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 at $1.37/m vs $3.76/m. Overall edge: Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 wins 2 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x is a night vision binocular manufactured by ATN. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 878 meters. MSRP is $3,299. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,299
- Detection: 878m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 1120g
- Battery: 16h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 2,400 meters. MSRP is $3,299. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,299
- Detection: 2,400m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 800g
- Battery: 8h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x | Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,299 | $3,299 |
| Weight | 1120g | 800g |
| Detection Range | 878m | 2,400m |
| Battery Life | 16h | 8h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x if you prioritize longer battery life.
Choose the Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0?
The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is $0 less expensive. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $3,299 while the Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is priced at $3,299.
Which has better detection range, ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0?
The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 has a 1522m longer detection range. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x detects up to 878m while the Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 reaches 2,400m.
Is the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is lighter at 800g, better for long carry. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x lasts longer at 16 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Armasight Contractor 640 4.8-19.2x75
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Armasight Contractor 640 4.8-19.2x75
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs AGM Rattler V2 35-384
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs AGM Rattler V2 35-384
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Sightmark Wraith Mini Thermal 2-16x35
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Sightmark Wraith Mini Thermal 2-16x35