ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs iRay RICO G GL35
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x and iRay RICO G GL35 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs iRay matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,200, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x runs 11h longer and costs $1,200 less. The iRay RICO G GL35 detects 422m further and is 540g lighter. Value pick: iRay RICO G GL35 at $3.46/m vs $3.76/m. Close call: both tie at 2-2 — pick based on priority specs.
Product Overview
ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x is a night vision binocular manufactured by ATN. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 878 meters. MSRP is $3,299. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,299
- Detection: 878m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 1120g
- Battery: 16h
- Refresh: 60Hz
iRay RICO G GL35
iRayThe iRay RICO G GL35 is a optic manufactured by iRay. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,300 meters. MSRP is $4,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $4,499
- Detection: 1,300m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 5h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x | iRay RICO G GL35 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,299 | $4,499 |
| Weight | 1120g | 580g |
| Detection Range | 878m | 1,300m |
| Battery Life | 16h | 5h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 640x480 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life.
Choose the iRay RICO G GL35 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x and iRay RICO G GL35?
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x is $1,200 less expensive. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $3,299 while the iRay RICO G GL35 is priced at $4,499.
Which has better detection range, ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x or iRay RICO G GL35?
The iRay RICO G GL35 has a 422m longer detection range. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x detects up to 878m while the iRay RICO G GL35 reaches 1,300m.
Is the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x or iRay RICO G GL35 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The iRay RICO G GL35 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x lasts longer at 16 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 5 5-25x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs InfiRay Outdoor RICO Mk1 V2 RH50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs InfiRay Outdoor RICO Mk1 V2 RH50
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35