ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x and Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Trijicon matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $6,485, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x runs 12.5h longer, costs $6,485 less, and adds WiFi. The Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm detects 1322m further. Value pick: ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x at $3.76/m vs $4.45/m. Overall edge: ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x is a night vision binocular manufactured by ATN. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 878 meters. MSRP is $3,299. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,299
- Detection: 878m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 1120g
- Battery: 16h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm
TrijiconThe Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm is a optic manufactured by Trijicon. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 2,200 meters. MSRP is $9,784. Key features include onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $9,784
- Detection: 2,200m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 1105g
- Battery: 3.5h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x | Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,299 | $9,784 |
| Weight | 1120g | 1105g |
| Detection Range | 878m | 2,200m |
| Battery Life | 16h | 3.5h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 640x480 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life.
Choose the Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x and Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm?
The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x is $6,485 less expensive. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $3,299 while the Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm is priced at $9,784.
Which has better detection range, ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x or Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm?
The Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm has a 1322m longer detection range. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x detects up to 878m while the Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm reaches 2,200m.
Is the ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x or Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm is lighter at 1105g, better for long carry. The ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x lasts longer at 16 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 5 5-25x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x vs AGM Clarion 640 Dual FOV
- Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm vs AGM Clarion 640 Dual FOV