ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs iRay RICO G GL35
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x and iRay RICO G GL35 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs iRay matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $2,800, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x detects 81m further, runs 4h longer, and costs $2,800 less. The iRay RICO G GL35 adds WiFi and video recording. Value pick: ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x at $1.23/m vs $3.46/m. Overall edge: ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x wins 3 vs 2 categories.
Product Overview
ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
ATNThe ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x is a optic manufactured by ATN. It features a 320x240 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,381 meters. MSRP is $1,699.
- MSRP: $1,699
- Detection: 1,381m
- Sensor: 320x240
- Weight: 560g
- Battery: 9h
- Refresh: 60Hz
iRay RICO G GL35
iRayThe iRay RICO G GL35 is a optic manufactured by iRay. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,300 meters. MSRP is $4,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $4,499
- Detection: 1,300m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 5h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x | iRay RICO G GL35 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,699 | $4,499 |
| Weight | 560g | 580g |
| Detection Range | 1,381m | 1,300m |
| Battery Life | 9h | 5h |
| Sensor | 320x240 | 640x480 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Video Recording | No | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x and iRay RICO G GL35?
The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x is $2,800 less expensive. The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x has an MSRP of $1,699 while the iRay RICO G GL35 is priced at $4,499.
Which has better detection range, ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x or iRay RICO G GL35?
The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x has a 81m longer detection range. The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x detects up to 1,381m while the iRay RICO G GL35 reaches 1,300m.
Is the ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x or iRay RICO G GL35 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x is lighter at 560g, making it better for extended hunts. The ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x lasts longer at 9 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs N-Vision Optics NOX18
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs N-Vision Optics NOX18
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs Bering Optics Hogster Stimulus VRF 2.3-4.6x19
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Bering Optics Hogster Stimulus VRF 2.3-4.6x19
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro