ATN PVS14-3 vs iRay RICO G GL35
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN PVS14-3 and iRay RICO G GL35 are both popular choices in the night vision device category, commonly used for night navigation, wildlife observation, and tactical applications. This is a ATN vs iRay matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to night vision device design. With a price difference of $251, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
This compares a night vision device to a thermal scope — different technologies for different use cases. The ATN PVS14-3 runs 45h longer and is 230g lighter. The iRay RICO G GL35 costs $251 less and adds WiFi and video recording. Overall edge: iRay RICO G GL35 wins 3 vs 2 categories.
Product Overview
ATN PVS14-3
ATNThe ATN PVS14-3 is a night vision monocular manufactured by ATN. MSRP is $4,750.
- MSRP: $4,750
- Weight: 350g
- Battery: 50h
iRay RICO G GL35
iRayThe iRay RICO G GL35 is a optic manufactured by iRay. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,300 meters. MSRP is $4,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $4,499
- Detection: 1,300m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 5h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN PVS14-3 | iRay RICO G GL35 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,750 | $4,499 |
| Weight | 350g | 580g |
| Detection Range | - | 1,300m |
| Battery Life | 50h | 5h |
| Sensor | - | 640x480 |
| Refresh Rate | - | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Video Recording | No | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN PVS14-3 if you prioritize lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Choose the iRay RICO G GL35 if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN PVS14-3 and iRay RICO G GL35?
The iRay RICO G GL35 is $251 less expensive. The ATN PVS14-3 has an MSRP of $4,750 while the iRay RICO G GL35 is priced at $4,499.
Is the ATN PVS14-3 or iRay RICO G GL35 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The ATN PVS14-3 is lighter at 350g, making it better for extended hunts. The ATN PVS14-3 lasts longer at 50 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN X-Sight 5 5-25x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- ATN PVS14-3 vs FLIR Breach PTQ136
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs FLIR Breach PTQ136
- ATN PVS14-3 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- ATN PVS14-3 vs AGM PVS-14 NL1
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs AGM PVS-14 NL1
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs AGM PVS-14 NW1
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs AGM PVS-14 NW1
- ATN PVS14-3 vs Sightmark Wraith Mini Thermal 2-16x35