ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,500, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x runs 7h longer, costs $1,500 less, and adds rangefinder. The Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 detects 1400m further. Value pick: Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 at $1.54/m vs $2.08/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.
- MSRP: $2,499
- Detection: 1,200m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 960g
- Battery: 18h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 2,600 meters. MSRP is $3,999. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,999
- Detection: 2,600m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 950g
- Battery: 11h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x | Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,499 | $3,999 |
| Weight | 960g | 950g |
| Detection Range | 1,200m | 2,600m |
| Battery Life | 18h | 11h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | Yes | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.
Choose the Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50?
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is $1,500 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 is priced at $3,999.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50?
The Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 has a 1400m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects up to 1,200m while the Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 reaches 2,600m.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 is lighter at 950g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Armasight Contractor 640 4.8-19.2x75
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs Armasight Contractor 640 4.8-19.2x75
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs InfiRay Outdoor BOLT TH50C V2
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs InfiRay Outdoor BOLT TH50C V2
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35