ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Sightmark matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $2,000, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
This compares a thermal scope to a digital night vision — different technologies for different use cases. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x runs 14h longer, is 70g lighter, and adds WiFi and rangefinder. The Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 costs $2,000 less. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 4 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.
- MSRP: $2,499
- Detection: 1,200m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 960g
- Battery: 18h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50
SightmarkThe Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 is a digital night vision scope manufactured by Sightmark. MSRP is $499. Key features include onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $499
- Sensor: 1920x1080
- Weight: 1030g
- Battery: 4h
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x | Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,499 | $499 |
| Weight | 960g | 1030g |
| Detection Range | 1,200m | - |
| Battery Life | 18h | 4h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 1920x1080 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | - |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | Yes | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.
Choose the Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 if you prioritize tighter budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50?
The Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 is $2,000 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 is priced at $499.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is lighter at 960g, making it better for extended hunts. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs Sightmark Wraith Mini Thermal 2-16x35
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs Sightmark Wraith 4K Mini
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs AGM Adder TS50-640
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs AGM Adder TS50-640
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs AGM Rattler V2 35-384
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs AGM Rattler V2 35-384
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0