ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $700, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x runs 10h longer. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is 470g lighter and costs $700 less. Overall edge: Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 wins 2 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 60Hz. MSRP is $4,199. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $4,199
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 1050g
- Battery: 16h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,199 | $3,499 |
| Weight | 1050g | 580g |
| Detection Range | - | 1,800m |
| Battery Life | 16h | 6h |
| Sensor | 640x480 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x if you prioritize longer battery life.
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is $700 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x has an MSRP of $4,199 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x lasts longer at 16 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs ATN X-Sight 5 5-25x
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs ATN PVS14-3
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x