ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x and Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,400, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x runs 5h longer. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is 700g lighter and costs $1,400 less. Overall edge: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro wins 2 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 60Hz. MSRP is $4,199. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $4,199
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 1050g
- Battery: 16h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
PulsarThe Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,280 meters. MSRP is $2,799. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,799
- Detection: 1,280m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 350g
- Battery: 11h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x | Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,199 | $2,799 |
| Weight | 1050g | 350g |
| Detection Range | - | 1,280m |
| Battery Life | 16h | 11h |
| Sensor | 640x480 | 384x288 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x if you prioritize longer battery life.
Choose the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x and Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro?
The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is $1,400 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x has an MSRP of $4,199 while the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is priced at $2,799.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x or Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is lighter at 350g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x lasts longer at 16 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XG50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs FLIR Breach PTQ136
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs FLIR Breach PTQ136
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs AGM Rattler TS19-256
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs AGM Rattler TS19-256
- ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0