ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $604, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x detects 850m further, runs 4h longer, and costs $604 less. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is 463g lighter. Value pick: ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x at $1.09/m vs $1.94/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 2,650 meters. MSRP is $2,895. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,895
- Detection: 2,650m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 1043g
- Battery: 10h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,895 | $3,499 |
| Weight | 1043g | 580g |
| Detection Range | 2,650m | 1,800m |
| Battery Life | 10h | 6h |
| Sensor | 640x480 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, longer battery life.
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x is $604 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x has an MSRP of $2,895 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x has a 850m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x detects up to 2,650m while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 reaches 1,800m.
Is the ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x lasts longer at 10 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x