ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,700, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x costs $1,700 less. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro detects 680m further, runs 1h longer, and is 330g lighter. Value pick: ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x at $1.83/m vs $2.19/m. Overall edge: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
ATNThe ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 160x120 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 600 meters. MSRP is $1,099. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $1,099
- Detection: 600m
- Sensor: 160x120
- Weight: 680g
- Battery: 10h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
PulsarThe Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,280 meters. MSRP is $2,799. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,799
- Detection: 1,280m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 350g
- Battery: 11h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x | Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,099 | $2,799 |
| Weight | 680g | 350g |
| Detection Range | 600m | 1,280m |
| Battery Life | 10h | 11h |
| Sensor | 160x120 | 384x288 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x if you prioritize tighter budget.
Choose the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro?
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is $1,700 less expensive. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x has an MSRP of $1,099 while the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is priced at $2,799.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro?
The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro has a 680m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x detects up to 600m while the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro reaches 1,280m.
Is the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is lighter at 350g, better for long carry. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro has longer battery life at 11 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x