Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 and Pulsar Proton FXQ30 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a Hikmicro vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $800, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 detects 900m further. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is 290g lighter and costs $800 less. Value pick: Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 at $1.94/m vs $3/m. Overall edge: Pulsar Proton FXQ30 wins 2 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Pulsar Proton FXQ30
PulsarThe Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 900 meters. MSRP is $2,699. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,699
- Detection: 900m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 290g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 | Pulsar Proton FXQ30 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,499 | $2,699 |
| Weight | 580g | 290g |
| Detection Range | 1,800m | 900m |
| Battery Life | 6h | 6h |
| Sensor | 640x512 | 384x288 |
| Refresh Rate | 50Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize longer detection range.
Choose the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 if you prioritize tighter budget, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 and Pulsar Proton FXQ30?
The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is $800 less expensive. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has an MSRP of $3,499 while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is priced at $2,699.
Which has better detection range, Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 or Pulsar Proton FXQ30?
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has a 900m longer detection range. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 detects up to 1,800m while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 reaches 900m.
Is the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 or Pulsar Proton FXQ30 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is lighter at 290g, better for long carry. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 has longer battery life at 6 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs AGM Adder TS50-640
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Adder TS50-640
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Armasight Contractor 640 4.8-19.2x75