iRay RICO G GL35 vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The iRay RICO G GL35 and Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a iRay vs Leupold matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $2,900, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The iRay RICO G GL35 detects 614m further and adds WiFi and video recording. The Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD runs 5h longer, is 311g lighter, and costs $2,900 less. Value pick: Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD at $2.33/m vs $3.46/m. Close call: both tie at 3-3 — pick based on priority specs.
Product Overview
iRay RICO G GL35
iRayThe iRay RICO G GL35 is a optic manufactured by iRay. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,300 meters. MSRP is $4,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $4,499
- Detection: 1,300m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 5h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
LeupoldThe Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD is a optic manufactured by Leupold. It features a 390x390 sensor running at 30Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 686 meters. MSRP is $1,599.
- MSRP: $1,599
- Detection: 686m
- Sensor: 390x390
- Weight: 269g
- Battery: 10h
- Refresh: 30Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | iRay RICO G GL35 | Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,499 | $1,599 |
| Weight | 580g | 269g |
| Detection Range | 1,300m | 686m |
| Battery Life | 5h | 10h |
| Sensor | 640x480 | 390x390 |
| Refresh Rate | 50Hz | 30Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Video Recording | Yes | No |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the iRay RICO G GL35 if you prioritize longer detection range.
Choose the Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD if you prioritize tighter budget, lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the iRay RICO G GL35 and Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD?
The Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD is $2,900 less expensive. The iRay RICO G GL35 has an MSRP of $4,499 while the Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD is priced at $1,599.
Which has better detection range, iRay RICO G GL35 or Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD?
The iRay RICO G GL35 has a 614m longer detection range. The iRay RICO G GL35 detects up to 1,300m while the Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD reaches 686m.
Is the iRay RICO G GL35 or Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD is lighter at 269g, better for long carry. The Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD has longer battery life at 10 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- iRay RICO G GL35 vs Armasight Contractor 320 6-24x50