ATN PVS14-3 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN PVS14-3 and Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro are both popular choices in the night vision device category, commonly used for night navigation, wildlife observation, and tactical applications. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to night vision device design. With a price difference of $1,951, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
This compares a night vision device to a thermal scope — different technologies for different use cases. The ATN PVS14-3 runs 39h longer. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro costs $1,951 less and adds WiFi and video recording. Overall edge: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN PVS14-3
ATNThe ATN PVS14-3 is a night vision monocular manufactured by ATN. MSRP is $4,750.
- MSRP: $4,750
- Weight: 350g
- Battery: 50h
Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
PulsarThe Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,280 meters. MSRP is $2,799. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,799
- Detection: 1,280m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 350g
- Battery: 11h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN PVS14-3 | Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,750 | $2,799 |
| Weight | 350g | 350g |
| Detection Range | - | 1,280m |
| Battery Life | 50h | 11h |
| Sensor | - | 384x288 |
| Refresh Rate | - | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Video Recording | No | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN PVS14-3 if you prioritize longer battery life.
Choose the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN PVS14-3 and Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro?
The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is $1,951 less expensive. The ATN PVS14-3 has an MSRP of $4,750 while the Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is priced at $2,799.
Is the ATN PVS14-3 or Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro is lighter at 350g, better for long carry. The ATN PVS14-3 lasts longer at 50 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Digex C50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XG50
- ATN PVS14-3 vs InfiRay Outdoor RICO Mk1 V2 RH50
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs InfiRay Outdoor RICO Mk1 V2 RH50
- ATN PVS14-3 vs InfiRay Outdoor BOLT TH50C V2
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs InfiRay Outdoor BOLT TH50C V2
- ATN PVS14-3 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- ATN PVS14-3 vs AGM Adder TS50-640
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs AGM Adder TS50-640
- Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x