ATN PVS14-3 vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN PVS14-3 and Pulsar Proton FXQ30 are both popular choices in the night vision device category, commonly used for night navigation, wildlife observation, and tactical applications. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to night vision device design. With a price difference of $2,051, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
This compares a night vision device to a thermal scope — different technologies for different use cases. The ATN PVS14-3 runs 44h longer. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is 60g lighter, costs $2,051 less, and adds WiFi and video recording. Overall edge: Pulsar Proton FXQ30 wins 4 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN PVS14-3
ATNThe ATN PVS14-3 is a night vision monocular manufactured by ATN. MSRP is $4,750.
- MSRP: $4,750
- Weight: 350g
- Battery: 50h
Pulsar Proton FXQ30
PulsarThe Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 900 meters. MSRP is $2,699. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,699
- Detection: 900m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 290g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN PVS14-3 | Pulsar Proton FXQ30 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,750 | $2,699 |
| Weight | 350g | 290g |
| Detection Range | - | 900m |
| Battery Life | 50h | 6h |
| Sensor | - | 384x288 |
| Refresh Rate | - | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Video Recording | No | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN PVS14-3 if you prioritize longer battery life.
Choose the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN PVS14-3 and Pulsar Proton FXQ30?
The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is $2,051 less expensive. The ATN PVS14-3 has an MSRP of $4,750 while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is priced at $2,699.
Is the ATN PVS14-3 or Pulsar Proton FXQ30 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is lighter at 290g, better for long carry. The ATN PVS14-3 lasts longer at 50 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN PVS14-3 vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- ATN PVS14-3 vs AGM Adder TS35-384
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Adder TS35-384
- ATN PVS14-3 vs N-Vision Optics NOX18
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs N-Vision Optics NOX18
- ATN PVS14-3 vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- ATN PVS14-3 vs AGM Wolverine Pro-4 NL1
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Wolverine Pro-4 NL1
- ATN PVS14-3 vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm