Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 and Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a Pulsar vs Steiner matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $900, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 detects 400m further, runs 2h longer, and is 220g lighter. The Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic costs $900 less. Value pick: Pulsar Proton FXQ30 at $3/m vs $3.6/m. Overall edge: Pulsar Proton FXQ30 wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
Pulsar Proton FXQ30
PulsarThe Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 900 meters. MSRP is $2,699. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,699
- Detection: 900m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 290g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic
SteinerThe Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic is a optic manufactured by Steiner. It features a 320x240 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 500 meters. MSRP is $1,799. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $1,799
- Detection: 500m
- Sensor: 320x240
- Weight: 510g
- Battery: 4h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | Pulsar Proton FXQ30 | Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,699 | $1,799 |
| Weight | 290g | 510g |
| Detection Range | 900m | 500m |
| Battery Life | 6h | 4h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 320x240 |
| Refresh Rate | 50Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Choose the Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic if you prioritize tighter budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 and Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic?
The Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic is $900 less expensive. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 has an MSRP of $2,699 while the Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic is priced at $1,799.
Which has better detection range, Pulsar Proton FXQ30 or Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic?
The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 has a 400m longer detection range. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 detects up to 900m while the Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic reaches 500m.
Is the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 or Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is lighter at 290g, making it better for extended hunts. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 lasts longer at 6 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Digex C50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic vs AGM Varmint LRF TS50-640
- Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XG50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Fuzion LRF TM50-640
- Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic vs AGM Fuzion LRF TM50-640
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- Steiner Cinder 3x Thermal Optic vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Bering Optics Super Yoter R 50mm 640