ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30

Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict

Select a brand and model

Select a brand and model

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Pulsar Proton FXQ30 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.

Comparison Summary

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects 300m further, runs 12h longer, costs $200 less, and adds rangefinder. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is 670g lighter. Value pick: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x at $2.08/m vs $3/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 4 vs 1 categories.

Product Overview

ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x

ATN

The ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.

  • MSRP: $2,499
  • Detection: 1,200m
  • Sensor: 384x288
  • Weight: 960g
  • Battery: 18h
  • Refresh: 60Hz

Pulsar Proton FXQ30

Pulsar

The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 900 meters. MSRP is $2,699. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.

  • MSRP: $2,699
  • Detection: 900m
  • Sensor: 384x288
  • Weight: 290g
  • Battery: 6h
  • Refresh: 50Hz

Key Specifications

SpecATN ThOR 4 384 2-8xPulsar Proton FXQ30
Price$2,499$2,699
Weight960g290g
Detection Range1,200m900m
Battery Life18h6h
Sensor384x288384x288
Refresh Rate60Hz50Hz
Wi-FiYesYes
Video RecordingYesYes
RangefinderYesNo

Which One Should You Pick?

Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.

Choose the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 if you prioritize lighter carry weight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Pulsar Proton FXQ30?

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is $200 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is priced at $2,699.

Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Pulsar Proton FXQ30?

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has a 300m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects up to 1,200m while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 reaches 900m.

Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Pulsar Proton FXQ30 better for hunting?

It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is lighter at 290g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.

Similar Comparisons

Related Guides

IR Illuminator Not Working With Night Vision? Beam, Battery, Focus and Compatibility Check.

IR Illuminator Not Working With Night Vision? Beam, Battery, Focus and Compatibility Check.

If your IR illuminator is dead, weak, washed out or invisible in night vision, begin with this field checklist of...

Read More →
Is your NV not turning on? Battery, Contacts, Mount and Tube-Safe Troubleshooting

Is your NV not turning on? Battery, Contacts, Mount and Tube-Safe Troubleshooting

When night vision doesn't come on, keep it simple: battery, polarity, cap, contacts, lens path, usable light, focus, mount, and...

Read More →
Night Vision Collimation and Alignment: Fix Double Vision, Eye Strain and Dual-Tube Setup Issues

Night Vision Collimation and Alignment: Fix Double Vision, Eye Strain and Dual-Tube Setup Issues

Double vision through night vision does not always mean your device is broken. Focus, diopter and IPD, helmet position and...

Read More →
MORE FROM BLOG