ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $800, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x runs 10h longer, costs $800 less, and adds rangefinder. The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 detects 1200m further and is 160g lighter. Value pick: Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 at $1.37/m vs $2.08/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 3 vs 2 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.
- MSRP: $2,499
- Detection: 1,200m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 960g
- Battery: 18h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 2,400 meters. MSRP is $3,299. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,299
- Detection: 2,400m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 800g
- Battery: 8h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x | Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,499 | $3,299 |
| Weight | 960g | 800g |
| Detection Range | 1,200m | 2,400m |
| Battery Life | 18h | 8h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | Yes | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.
Choose the Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0?
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is $800 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is priced at $3,299.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0?
The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 has a 1200m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects up to 1,200m while the Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 reaches 2,400m.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 is lighter at 800g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 5 5-25x
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Trijicon REAP-IR 60mm
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs AGM Taipan TM15-256
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro