ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Digex C50
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Pulsar Digex C50 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,100, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
This compares a thermal scope to a digital night vision — different technologies for different use cases. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects 650m further, runs 8h longer, is 190g lighter, and adds rangefinder. The Pulsar Digex C50 costs $1,100 less. Value pick: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x at $2.08/m vs $2.54/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 4 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.
- MSRP: $2,499
- Detection: 1,200m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 960g
- Battery: 18h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Pulsar Digex C50
PulsarThe Pulsar Digex C50 is a digital night vision scope manufactured by Pulsar. Maximum detection range reaches 550 meters. MSRP is $1,399. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $1,399
- Detection: 550m
- Sensor: 1928x1088
- Weight: 1150g
- Battery: 10h
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x | Pulsar Digex C50 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,499 | $1,399 |
| Weight | 960g | 1150g |
| Detection Range | 1,200m | 550m |
| Battery Life | 18h | 10h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 1928x1088 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | - |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | Yes | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.
Choose the Pulsar Digex C50 if you prioritize tighter budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Pulsar Digex C50?
The Pulsar Digex C50 is $1,100 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Pulsar Digex C50 is priced at $1,399.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Pulsar Digex C50?
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has a 650m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects up to 1,200m while the Pulsar Digex C50 reaches 550m.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Pulsar Digex C50 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is lighter at 960g, making it better for extended hunts. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Armasight Contractor 320 6-24x50
- Pulsar Digex C50 vs Armasight Contractor 320 6-24x50
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Burris BTC35 V3