ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0

Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict

Select a brand and model

Select a brand and model

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,000, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.

Comparison Summary

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x runs 12h longer, costs $1,000 less, and adds rangefinder. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 detects 600m further and is 380g lighter. Value pick: Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 at $1.94/m vs $2.08/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 3 vs 2 categories.

Product Overview

ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x

ATN

The ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.

  • MSRP: $2,499
  • Detection: 1,200m
  • Sensor: 384x288
  • Weight: 960g
  • Battery: 18h
  • Refresh: 60Hz

Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0

Hikmicro

The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.

  • MSRP: $3,499
  • Detection: 1,800m
  • Sensor: 640x512
  • Weight: 580g
  • Battery: 6h
  • Refresh: 50Hz

Key Specifications

SpecATN ThOR 4 384 2-8xHikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Price$2,499$3,499
Weight960g580g
Detection Range1,200m1,800m
Battery Life18h6h
Sensor384x288640x512
Refresh Rate60Hz50Hz
Wi-FiYesYes
Video RecordingYesYes
RangefinderYesNo

Which One Should You Pick?

Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.

Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?

The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is $1,000 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.

Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?

The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has a 600m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects up to 1,200m while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 reaches 1,800m.

Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?

It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.

Similar Comparisons

Related Guides

MORE FROM BLOG