ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,000, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x runs 12h longer, costs $1,000 less, and adds rangefinder. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 detects 600m further and is 380g lighter. Value pick: Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 at $1.94/m vs $2.08/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x wins 3 vs 2 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
ATNThe ATN ThOR 4 384 combines thermal imaging with smart features including ballistic calculator, WiFi streaming, and built-in rangefinder. A feature-packed option for tech-savvy hunters.
- MSRP: $2,499
- Detection: 1,200m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 960g
- Battery: 18h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,499 | $3,499 |
| Weight | 960g | 580g |
| Detection Range | 1,200m | 1,800m |
| Battery Life | 18h | 6h |
| Sensor | 384x288 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | Yes | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life, built-in rangefinder.
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x is $1,000 less expensive. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x has an MSRP of $2,499 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has a 600m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x detects up to 1,200m while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 reaches 1,800m.
Is the ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs ATN PVS14-3
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs InfiRay SAIM SCL35
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Trijicon REAP-IR 35mm
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro
- ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x vs AGM Adder TS35-384