ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the digital night vision scope category, commonly used for hunting in low light, video recording, and day/night versatility. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to digital night vision scope design. With a price difference of $2,800, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
This compares a digital night vision to a thermal scope — different technologies for different use cases. The ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x runs 12h longer and costs $2,800 less. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is 360g lighter. Overall edge: ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x wins 2 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
ATNThe ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x is a digital night vision scope manufactured by ATN. MSRP is $699. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $699
- Sensor: 3864x2218
- Weight: 940g
- Battery: 18h
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $699 | $3,499 |
| Weight | 940g | 580g |
| Detection Range | - | 1,800m |
| Battery Life | 18h | 6h |
| Sensor | 3864x2218 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | - | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life.
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x is $2,800 less expensive. The ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x has an MSRP of $699 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.
Is the ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x lasts longer at 18 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs ATN PVS14-3
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs ATN X-Sight 5 5-25x
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs Bering Optics Super Yoter R 50mm 640
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Bering Optics Super Yoter R 50mm 640
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Sightmark Wraith HD 4-32x50
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x vs FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233