ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $2,400, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x runs 4h longer and costs $2,400 less. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 detects 1200m further and is 100g lighter. Value pick: ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x at $1.83/m vs $1.94/m. Close call: both tie at 2-2 — pick based on priority specs.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
ATNThe ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 160x120 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 600 meters. MSRP is $1,099. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $1,099
- Detection: 600m
- Sensor: 160x120
- Weight: 680g
- Battery: 10h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,099 | $3,499 |
| Weight | 680g | 580g |
| Detection Range | 600m | 1,800m |
| Battery Life | 10h | 6h |
| Sensor | 160x120 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life.
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is $2,400 less expensive. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x has an MSRP of $1,099 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has a 1200m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x detects up to 600m while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 reaches 1,800m.
Is the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x lasts longer at 10 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Burris BTC35 V3
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Burris BTC35 V3
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs AGM Rattler TS19-256
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs AGM Rattler TS19-256
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro