FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a FLIR vs Hikmicro matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $496, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 detects 800m further, runs 2h longer, is 70g lighter, costs $496 less, and adds WiFi. Value pick: Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 at $1.94/m vs $4/m. Overall edge: Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 wins 5 vs 0 categories.
Product Overview
FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233
FLIRThe FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 is a optic manufactured by FLIR. It features a 320x256 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,000 meters. MSRP is $3,995. Key features include onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,995
- Detection: 1,000m
- Sensor: 320x256
- Weight: 650g
- Battery: 4h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0
HikmicroThe Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is a optic manufactured by Hikmicro. It features a 640x512 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,800 meters. MSRP is $3,499. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $3,499
- Detection: 1,800m
- Sensor: 640x512
- Weight: 580g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 | Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,995 | $3,499 |
| Weight | 650g | 580g |
| Detection Range | 1,000m | 1,800m |
| Battery Life | 4h | 6h |
| Sensor | 320x256 | 640x512 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 if you prioritize tighter budget, longer detection range, lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 and Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is $496 less expensive. The FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 has an MSRP of $3,995 while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is priced at $3,499.
Which has better detection range, FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0?
The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has a 800m longer detection range. The FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 detects up to 1,000m while the Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 reaches 1,800m.
Is the FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 or Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 is lighter at 580g, better for long carry. The Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 has longer battery life at 6 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs FLIR Breach PTQ136
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Thunder TQ50C 2.0
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Hikmicro Alpex A50T
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ35 Pro
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ35 Pro
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs Bering Optics Hogster Stimulus VRF 2.3-4.6x19
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Bering Optics Hogster Stimulus VRF 2.3-4.6x19
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs iRay RICO G GL35
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs iRay RICO G GL35
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Thermion Duo DXP50
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XG50
- Hikmicro Condor CQ35L LRF 2.0 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XG50
- FLIR ThermoSight Pro PTS233 vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x