ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs N-Vision matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $5,396, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x runs 3h longer, is 57g lighter, and costs $5,396 less. The N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 detects 1100m further. Value pick: ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x at $1.83/m vs $3.82/m. Overall edge: ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x wins 3 vs 1 categories.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
ATNThe ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 160x120 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 600 meters. MSRP is $1,099. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $1,099
- Detection: 600m
- Sensor: 160x120
- Weight: 680g
- Battery: 10h
- Refresh: 60Hz
N-Vision Optics HALO-X35
N-VisionThe N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 is a optic manufactured by N-Vision. It features a 640x480 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 1,700 meters. MSRP is $6,495. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $6,495
- Detection: 1,700m
- Sensor: 640x480
- Weight: 737g
- Battery: 7h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x | N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,099 | $6,495 |
| Weight | 680g | 737g |
| Detection Range | 600m | 1,700m |
| Battery Life | 10h | 7h |
| Sensor | 160x120 | 640x480 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x if you prioritize tighter budget, lighter carry weight, longer battery life.
Choose the N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 if you prioritize longer detection range.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and N-Vision Optics HALO-X35?
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is $5,396 less expensive. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x has an MSRP of $1,099 while the N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 is priced at $6,495.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or N-Vision Optics HALO-X35?
The N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 has a 1100m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x detects up to 600m while the N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 reaches 1,700m.
Is the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is lighter at 680g, making it better for extended hunts. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x lasts longer at 10 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN ThOR 4 640 2.5-25x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN ThOR 4 384 2-8x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs N-Vision Optics HALO-X50
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs N-Vision Optics NOX18
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Bering Optics Hogster Stimulus VRF 2.3-4.6x19
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs Bering Optics Hogster Stimulus VRF 2.3-4.6x19
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs Hikmicro Stellar 2.0 SQ50
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs InfiRay Outdoor BOLT TH50C V2
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs InfiRay Outdoor BOLT TH50C V2
- N-Vision Optics HALO-X35 vs ATN BinoX 4T 384 2-8x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs AGM Fuzion LRF TM50-640