ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Pulsar Proton FXQ30
Side-by-side specs, performance, prices, and expert verdict
Select a brand and model
Select a brand and model
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and Pulsar Proton FXQ30 are both popular choices in the thermal rifle scope category, commonly used for predator hunting, hog control, and long-range target acquisition. This is a ATN vs Pulsar matchup, two brands with distinct approaches to thermal rifle scope design. With a price difference of $1,600, the value proposition matters. Below we break down the key specs, features, and real-world differences to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget.
Comparison Summary
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x runs 4h longer and costs $1,600 less. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 detects 300m further and is 390g lighter. Value pick: ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x at $1.83/m vs $3/m. Close call: both tie at 2-2 — pick based on priority specs.
Product Overview
ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x
ATNThe ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is a thermal rifle scope manufactured by ATN. It features a 160x120 sensor running at 60Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 600 meters. MSRP is $1,099. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $1,099
- Detection: 600m
- Sensor: 160x120
- Weight: 680g
- Battery: 10h
- Refresh: 60Hz
Pulsar Proton FXQ30
PulsarThe Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is a optic manufactured by Pulsar. It features a 384x288 sensor running at 50Hz. Maximum detection range reaches 900 meters. MSRP is $2,699. Key features include Wi-Fi streaming, onboard video recording.
- MSRP: $2,699
- Detection: 900m
- Sensor: 384x288
- Weight: 290g
- Battery: 6h
- Refresh: 50Hz
Key Specifications
| Spec | ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x | Pulsar Proton FXQ30 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,099 | $2,699 |
| Weight | 680g | 290g |
| Detection Range | 600m | 900m |
| Battery Life | 10h | 6h |
| Sensor | 160x120 | 384x288 |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 50Hz |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Rangefinder | No | No |
Which One Should You Pick?
Choose the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x if you prioritize tighter budget, longer battery life.
Choose the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 if you prioritize longer detection range, lighter carry weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the price difference between the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x and Pulsar Proton FXQ30?
The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x is $1,600 less expensive. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x has an MSRP of $1,099 while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is priced at $2,699.
Which has better detection range, ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or Pulsar Proton FXQ30?
The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 has a 300m longer detection range. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x detects up to 600m while the Pulsar Proton FXQ30 reaches 900m.
Is the ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x or Pulsar Proton FXQ30 better for hunting?
It depends on your hunting style. The Pulsar Proton FXQ30 is lighter at 290g, better for long carry. The ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x lasts longer at 10 hours. Consider what matters more for your typical outing.
Similar Comparisons
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN X-Sight 4K Pro 3-14x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs ATN ThOR 5 640 3-24x
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 XQ50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Digex C50
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs ATN OTS LT 320 4-8x
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs AGM Fuzion LRF TM50-640
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs AGM Fuzion LRF TM50-640
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Leupold LTO Tracker 2 HD
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs Bering Optics Super Hogster A3
- ATN ThOR LT 160 3-6x vs iRay RICO G GL35
- Pulsar Proton FXQ30 vs iRay RICO G GL35